Legal Opinion

Oglebay Norton Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Sec. 108.05 (4), Stats., prescribes certain conditions which an employer must fulfil before vacation pay may be treated as wages for a particular week. In the case before us the employer met the statutory conditions. The question presented is whether the contract prevented the employer from allocating the vacation pay to weeks 47 and 48. The statute does not give an employer a right to allocate vacation pay to a period he desires if a contract requires him to treat some other period as vacation.

The material facts in the present case are virtually undisputed. The question must be resolved by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Danielson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. General Drivers & Helpers Union, Local 662 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Valeo v. J. I. Case Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Florida Industrial CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Brink v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API