Legal Opinion

Danielson v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*376Fairchild, J.

The legal issues presented on this appeal differ in some respects from those presented in the companion case, ante, p. 345. One such difference, although we do not view it as controlling, is that in 1956 sec. 108.05 (4) (b), Stats., was in force. It provides as follows:

“(b) An employee’s vacation pay shall, for benefit purposes, be treated as wages for a given week only if it has by the close of that week become definitely allocated and payable to the employee for that week and he has had due notice of such allocation; provided that, in any case where an employee’s vacation pay…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Valeo v. J. I. Case Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Oglebay Norton Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Brink v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Danielson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API