Legal Opinion

Brink v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1965Published

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

It was the employer’s position before the commission that at the time of discharge it became obligated to each plaintiff for an amount of money, due and payable as soon as the computation could be made; that for purposes of plaintiffs’ eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits, this amount represented wages which the employer could allocate, at the particular plaintiff’s full weekly wage rate to the successive weeks immediately following the discharge (which occurred in week No. 29); and that the notice of discharge sufficiently apprised each plaintiff of such allocation to be due…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Globe-Democrat Publishing Co. v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Darling v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Danielson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Oglebay Norton Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API