Legal Opinion

Valeo v. J. I. Case Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1963PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Entitlement to vacation pay is a matter of contract.

The basic problem in this case arises because the termination date in the collective-bargaining agreement is February 29th and the eligibility date for determining vacation rights is June 1st. The agreement contains no provision which expressly solves the problem.

The agreement, by its terms, was capable of perpetual existence, but either party was free to terminate it as of the last day of February of 1960 or any subsequent year. If ever so terminated, the present problem was bound to arise. Would the employees who had performed service…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marathon Electric Manufacturing Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Pattenge v. Wagner Iron WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Dehnart v. Waukesha Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. Ryan Aeronautical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Knecht v. Bd. of Trustees for State Col.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  3. Hartman v. FreedmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. Compton v. Shopko Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. General Drivers & Helpers Union, Local 662 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API