Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
In the instant cases no question is raised by the employer or employees as to whether the vacation payments received by the employees were “wages” under sec. 108.05 (4) (b), Stats., which is the applicable statute. The employees concededly received sufficient vacation payments to exceed their applicable weekly benefit rates if the employer's allocation to the weeks immediately after their layoffs in March, 1958, was permitted by the collective-bargaining agreement. Therefore, the issue before us is whether such allocation of the vacation periods by the employer was permissible under the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Georgiades v. GlickmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Van Roy v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- George J. Meyer Manufacturing Co. v. Howard Brass & Copper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Trzebietowski v. JereskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Mrs. Drenk's Foods, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hanz Trucking, Inc. v. Harris Brothers Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Zweck v. D P Way Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Gregory v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Martinson v. Brooks Equipment Leasing, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Kessler v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.