Legal Opinion

Young v. Merchants' Insurance

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina

Decided December 10, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On Motion to Tax Costs.

1Opinion of the CourtSimonton, J.

This is a question of taxation of costs, coming up on review of a taxation by the clerk of this court. The action was on a policy of insurance. It was originally brought in the circuit court of South Carolina, sitting for the county of Abbeville, and was removed into this court, the controversy being between a citizen of South Carolina and a corporation created under the laws of the state of New Jersey.

The first.question is as to costs incurred in the state court. As we have seen, the action was commenced in the state court. A petition for removal, with every -formality required by law, was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steamship Co. v. TugmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Spaulding v. TuckerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1871
  3. Dreskill v. ParishU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1851
  4. AnonymousU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1863

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vincennes Steel Corporation v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  2. Sloss Iron & Steel Co. v. South Carolina & G. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1896
  3. Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of Columbia v. MitchellDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1930
  4. Humphries v. StarnsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API