Legal Opinion

Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of Columbia v. Mitchell

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided March 14, 1930No. 1750PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERNEST F. COCHRAN, District Judge.

This is a question of taxation of costs, coming up on review of a taxation by the clerk of this court. The clerk taxed as a part of the defendants’ costs the fees of two of their witnesses who attended at the trial but did not testify. It is shown by an affidavit (which is not contradicted) that the reason that they did not testify was that they were summoned to testify to certain material admissions made by certain officers of the plaintiff, and that those officers on cross-examination admitted the matters which the defendants expected to prove by these two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kirby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  2. Bracken v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  3. Burrow v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1893
  4. Mims v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
  5. Young v. Merchants' InsuranceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gleckman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  2. Spiritwood Grain Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. United States v. Theron C. Lynd, Circuit Clerk and Registrar of Voters of Forrest County, State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  4. Vorburger v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1969
  5. Mueller v. PowellDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API