Legal Opinion
Humphries v. Starns
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided December 30, 1949No. A-4979PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, District Judge.
Defendants have filed objections to plaintiffs’ amended cost bill, the controversial items of which are as follows:
“Witness fees:
Harry Prator 7 days @ $6.00 $42.00'
Jack Barrett 7 days @ $6.00 $42.00
Harry Andrews 7 days @ $6.00 $42.00
Frank V. Jones 7 days @ $6.00 $42,00
Howard Robinson 7 days @ $6.00 $42.00
Jack Castlio 7 days @ $6.00 $42.00
Dorothy Cavin 7 days @ $6.00 $42.00
Eldon Helgelien 7 days @ $6.00 $42.00
$336.00”
“Expenses incurred in travel for Attorney William Alward from his home in Herington, Kansas to Anchorage, Alaska and return to repre*539sent plaintiffs in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kirby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- The VernonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1888
- Forno v. CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. California Cotton Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Donato v. Parker Pen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gillam v. A. Shyman, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1962
- Roden v. Empire Printing CompanyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1955
- Jonas v. Bank of KodiakDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1958
- Hansen v. City of CordovaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1952