Legal Opinion
Vincennes Steel Corporation v. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1938No. 8633PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from an order of the District Court overruling the motion of appellant to retax the costs and to eliminate certain items therefrom. The issue presented involves the power of the court to make the, challenged allowances, and it was proper to grant the appeal. Williams v. Sawyer Bros., 2 Cir., 51 F.2d 1004, 81 A.L.R. 1527; United States v. Knowles’ Estate, 9 Cir., 58 F.2d 718, 719; Walker v. Lee, 9 Cir., 71 F.2d 622.
The costs in controversy were awarded in an action at law by appellee, who had brought his witnesses to court to testify in the case. Before the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- United States v. SanbornSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. RinggoldSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Lowe v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Wooster v. HandyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Caryl Chessman v. Harley O. Teets, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Perlman v. FeldmannDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
- Kemart Corporation, a Corporation v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Sterling Federal Systems, Inc. v. Daniel S. Goldin, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Howard Farmer v. Arabian American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.