Legal Opinion
Sloss Iron & Steel Co. v. South Carolina & G. R.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina
Decided July 2, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.
This case comes up on an exception to the taxation of costs made by the clerk. There are two exceptions.
Roberts and McQueen, citizens and residents of Birmingham, Ala., attended the trial of the case, witnesses for the plaintiff, not under subpoena. The latter was sworn and examined. The former was present, but was not sworn. A ruling of the court as to the issue before the jury prevented him from going on the stand. Plaintiff has charged per diem and mileage from Birmingham for each of these witnesses. The clerk has allowed the per diem, but lias not allowed mileage…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. SanbornU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1886
- Whipple v. Cumberland Cotton Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1844
- Spaulding v. TuckerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1871
- The VernonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1888
- Goldsmith v. The SyracuseU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Vincennes Steel Corporation v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Kirby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- Barnhart v. JonesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1949
- Hanchett v. HumphreyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1899
- United States v. Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.