Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Tucker

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California

Decided August 19, 1871PublishedCited by 18 opinions

[This was an action by Nathan W. Spauld-ing against William Tucker and others for the infringement of letters patent No. 33,-270, granted to complainant September 10, 1861, reissued April 21, 1863, No. 1,450, for an improved mode of inserting detachable teeth in circular saw plates. There was a judgment for the complainant. Case No. 13,220. It is now heard upon motion to re-tax the complainant’s bill of costs.]

1Opinion of the Court

SAWYER, Circuit Judge.

The defendant objects to three classes of items included in complainant’s bill of costs. Firstly, an item of three hundred and sixty dollars for printing evidence. Secondly, sundry items of travelling fees of witnesses, who reside out of the district of California, and more than one hundred miles from the place of hearing, and who, voluntarily, attended and testified at the hearing. Thirdly, the traveling fees of a large number of witnesses, who, at complainant’s request, voluntarily went from their respective places of abode in different states to the city of New York,…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. SanbornU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1886
  2. Ferguson v. DentU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1891
  3. The VernonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1888
  4. Alexander v. HarrisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Hanchett v. HumphreyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API