Carson v. Atrium Medical Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Cathy Bissoon, United States District Judge
For the reasons stated below, the Atrium Medical Corporation, Maquet Cardio*475vascular US Sales, LLC,1 Maquet Cardiovascular, LLC and Maquet Medical System USA’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 17) will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
I. MEMORANDUM
BACKGROUND2
On May 27, 2009, Cathleen Carson (“Plaintiff’ or “Ms. Carson”) underwent a repair to a right inguinal hernia. Am. Compl. (Doc. 15) at ¶ 26. The hernia was repaired by physicians at Jefferson Regional Medical Center using a polypropylene mesh. Id. The mesh implanted in Plaintiff was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rocks v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Baldino v. CastagnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Lance v. WyethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bostic v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Ford v. St. Jude MedicalDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Kohn v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Lopez v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- MCDONNELL v. FLOWONIX MEDICAL INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.