Legal Opinion

Bostic v. Johnson & Johnson

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2022No. 2:20-cv-06533Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LAVONIA BOSTIC : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : ETHICON INC. AND : JOHNSON & JOHNSON : NO. 20-6533 MEMORANDUM Padova, J. March 29, 2022 Plaintiff Lavonia Bostic filed this action against Defendants Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, alleging that she suffered injuries after being implanted with the Gynecare TVT pelvic mesh product that was manufactured, sold, and distributed by Defendants. Defendants have moved to dismiss her First Amended Complaint (“Complaint”). For the following reasons, the Motion to Dismiss is granted…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API