Legal Opinion

Baldino v. Castagna

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1984PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDermott, justice.

This appeal is from an Order of the Superior Court, 308 Pa.Super. 506, 454 A.2d 1012, reversing the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, which had denied the motion for a new trial of the plaintiffs, appellees herein. We reverse.

Plaintiffs initiated this negligence action in May, 1975, against Armand Castagna, M.D., and CIBA-GEIGY Corporation. On January 16, 1976, Dr. Castagna joined Morris Park Pharmacy as an additional defendant. After a three week jury trial the jury returned a verdict against Dr. Castagna, 1 and in favor of Morris Park Pharmacy and CIBA-GEIGY. 2

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Burrell v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Brown v. McLean Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Ason v. LeonhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Bolus v. United Penn BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Davis v. Berwind Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Lance v. WyethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. In Re Zyprexa Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API