Legal Opinion

Lance v. Wyeth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 2014PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.1

This appeal concerns whether, under Pennsylvania products-liability law, a pharmaceutical company is immune from the responsibility to respond in damages for a lack of due care resulting in personal injury or death, except per two discrete grounds, namely, on account of drug impurities or deficient warnings.

The designated appellant, Wyeth, was a Delaware corporation,2 previously known as American Home Products Corporation. The company manufactured and/or supplied two related appetite suppressants which were prescribed by physicians and weight-loss clinics prolifically…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Barton v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Walters v. UPMC Presbyterian ShadysideSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Schanne, R., Aplt. v. Addis, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Smith v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API