Legal Opinion
MCDONNELL v. FLOWONIX MEDICAL INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 25, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01404Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RUTH MCDONNELL and, : GARY MCDONNELL, : : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, : : NO. 21-1404 v. : : FLOWONIX MEDICAL INC., : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM TUCKER, J. January 25, 2022 Presently before the Court is Defendant Flowonix Medical Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Flowonix”) Partial Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition (ECF No. 14), and Defendant’s Reply Brief (ECF No. 17). Upon careful consideration of the Parties’ submissions, and for the reasons outlined below, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED IN PART…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Karen Malleus v. John GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Peter Bistrian v. Troy LeviCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.