In Re Gilliam
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
By this proceeding in habeas corpus petitioner challenges the propriety of the trial court’s adjudication that he is an habitual criminal. (Pen. Code, § 644.)
The information contained three counts, respectively charging petitioner with burglary and with two prior convictions of felonies. One of the prior convictions was alleged to have been for burglary committed in Texas, for which judgment was “pronounced and rendered and the defendant served a term of imprisonment” in the Texas State Prison. The other prior conviction was alleged to have been for “box car robbery, a felony,” for which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. DawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re BoatwrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- People v. LohrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- State v. VaughnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
- People v. McChesneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- In Re WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re HarincarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.