In Re Seeley
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is a proceeding in habeas corpus. The petitioner is confined in the State Prison at Folsom under a judgment of conviction on his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary of the first degree and an adjudication that he is an habitual criminal by virtue of his admission of two prior convictions of a felony. The basis for his application for release *296from custody is his claim that one of the prior convictions did not constitute a felony for which he could be adjudged an habitual criminal and that his sentence is therefore excessive and void.
The petitioner was accused by information of the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Fortenbury v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re RosencrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re TartarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. NilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.