Legal Opinion

In Re Wolfson

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1947No. Crim. 4757PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

By application for relief through the writ of habeas corpus petitioner attacks the adjudication that he is an habitual criminal, punishable under section 644 and related sections of the Penal Code. We have concluded that petitioner is an habitual criminal twice previously convicted and “shall be deemed to be imprisoned for life and shall be eligible for release on parole after he shall have served a minimum term of seven calendar years.” (Pen. Code, § 3048.5, ad. Stats. 1945, ch. 934, § 4.)

It appears that petitioner was charged with the primary offense of grand theft, allegedly committed on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Kelley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. In Re HarincarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. In Re GilliamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In re WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. In Re HorowitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API