Legal Opinion

In Re McVickers

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1946No. Crim. 4680PublishedCited by 160 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Petitioner, by application for the writ of habeas corpus, seeks review of the adjudication or finding that he, “having been previously three times convicted, upon charges separately brought and tried, and having served separate terms therefor in state and/or federal penitentiaries for crimes enumerated in Section 644 of the Penal Code . . ., is an habitual criminal under the provisions of Section 644 of the Penal Code.” For the reasons hereinafter expressed we have concluded that a prisoner can, on application for habeas corpus, attack and secure appropriate relief from such an adjudication…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. RalphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by160 opinions

  1. People v. DuvallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re YurkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API