Legal Opinion

People v. Lohr

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 1938No. Crim. 3130PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

The defendant entered a plea of guilty to the charge of forgery. The information contained two separate charges of former convictions of felonies in the following language: ‘ ‘ That before the commission of the offense herein-above set forth in this information, said defendant, Franklin H. Lorh (under the name of Frank Henry Lohr), was, in the District Court of the United States, in and for the Southern District, Central Division, of the State of California, convicted of the crime of Dyer Act, a felony, and the judgment of said Court against said defendant, in said connection, was, on or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. People v. CarrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. People v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. People v. FitzwaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. In Re FinleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API