Legal Opinion

Scott v. Superior Sunset Oil Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1904No. L.A. No. 1247PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This is an action for services rendered as a physician and surgeon. The trial was had without a jury, and plaintiff had judgment for twelve hundred dollars. The defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying it a new trial.

The services for which compensation is sought consisted of several surgical operations and some sixty-one days’ attendance upon an employee of defendant named Cornell. It appears by the admissions in the pleadings-and from the evidence that Cornell was employed to go upon the oil-lands of defendant and hold possession thereof and protect the same…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crowley v. Genesee Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Streeten v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Fraser v. San Francisco Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brown v. Crown Gold Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Smith v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
  3. West Side Oil Co. v. McDormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Richman v. Bank of PerrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Commercial Security Co. v. Modesto Drug Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API