Scott v. Superior Sunset Oil Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
This is an action for services rendered as a physician and surgeon. The trial was had without a jury, and plaintiff had judgment for twelve hundred dollars. The defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying it a new trial.
The services for which compensation is sought consisted of several surgical operations and some sixty-one days’ attendance upon an employee of defendant named Cornell. It appears by the admissions in the pleadings-and from the evidence that Cornell was employed to go upon the oil-lands of defendant and hold possession thereof and protect the same…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crowley v. Genesee Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Streeten v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Fraser v. San Francisco Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by18 opinions
- Brown v. Crown Gold Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Smith v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
- West Side Oil Co. v. McDormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Richman v. Bank of PerrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Commercial Security Co. v. Modesto Drug Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.