Fraser v. San Francisco Bridge Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover the sum of one thousand dollars alleged to be due him for medical services rendered to one John Howden at the request of the defendant. The answer denied that the services were rendered at the request of defendant, or that defendant was in any way liable therefor. The plaintiff recovered a judgment for the sum of six hundred and sixteen dollars, from which, and from an order refusing a new trial, the defendant appeals:
*81It appears from the record that on the 19th of May, 1890, the defendant was engaged in the erection of a bridge in Sonoma…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Scott v. Superior Sunset Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Medberry v. OlcovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Scott v. Monte Cristo Oil & Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Blood v. La Serena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.