Legal Opinion

Streeten v. Robinson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1894No. 15260PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated m the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This is an action by Streeten, as assignee in insolvency of the American Bridge and Building Company (a corporation), to recover from the defendant the sum of eight thousand nine hundred and sixty-seven dollars and fifty-two cents averred to have been received *544by said defendant to the use of said insolvent, and by him converted to his own use.

The cause was tried by the court, and findings in writing filed in defendant’s favor, upon which he had judgment, from which, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

According to the findings the insolvent, on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Insurance v. OakleyNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  2. Crowley v. Genesee Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Southgate v. Atlantic & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  4. Turner v. Chillicothe & Des Moines City RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  5. Pixley v. The Western Pac. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Golden State Glass Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Kelly v. Ning Yung Benevolent Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Pacific Bank v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Scott v. Superior Sunset Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API