Legal Opinion

Commercial Security Co. v. Modesto Drug Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 1919No. Civ. No. 1956PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Plaintiff, an Illinois corporation, brought the action against defendant, a California corporation, to recover judgment on two promissory notes, each for four hundred dollars, dated December 4, 1915, payable to the Partin Manufacturing Company and alleged to have been duly indorsed and delivered by the payee to plaintiff prior to maturity. Judgment was in favor of defendant, from which judgment plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

The Modesto Drug Company was engaged in the retail drug business in the city of Modesto. The capital stock of the corporation, with the exception of one share, was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Greig v. RiordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Crowley v. Genesee Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Brown v. Crown Gold Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Gribble v. Columbus Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Hotaling v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Brown v. World ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Bryan v. BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Peoples State Bank v. PenelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API