Legal Opinion

Richman v. Bank of Perris

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1929No. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, J.

This is an action in equity, brought to set aside a sale of certain bank stock made under a pur ported assessment, and to declare the plaintiff the owner of said stock.

On a previous appeal (Rickman v. Bank of Perris, 73 Cal. App. 321 [238 Pac. 754]), it was held that a demurrer to the complaint had been improperly sustained, that the complaint stated a cause of action, and the case was reversed with directions to permit an answer. An answer having been filed and a trial had on the issues set up, the matter is now before us on the facts alleged in both the complaint and the answer, so far as…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Kreamer v. EarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Couts v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Benson v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Burns v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Pacific Western Oil Co. v. Bern Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. D. K. Porter, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Abe Greenband v. Woodey B. Searle and Edlean E. SearleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  5. Russell v. SoldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API