Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Smith

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 30, 1994No. 93-636PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

The petitioner, Roland Spencer Smith, Psy.D., petitions for a writ of certiorari seeking to vacate a decision of the New Hampshire Board of Examiners of Psychology and Mental Health Practice (board) permanently revoking his certificate to practice psychology for engaging in unprofessional conduct within the meaning of RSA 330-A:14 (1984). Dr. Smith argues that the board erred by: (1) not having every member of the hearing panel present for testimony of the complainant and Dr. Smith that was used by the panel to determine issues of credibility; (2) failing to specify allegations made against…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. In re GrimmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. State v. MayaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Appeal of PlantierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. New Hampshire Department of Corrections v. ButlandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. Appeal of DellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. In re PreisendorferSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  4. Appeal of MorganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. Auger v. Town of StraffordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API