Legal Opinion
State v. Maya
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 28, 1985No. 84-156; No. 84-391PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.
The defendant appeals two convictions following separate trials for burglary under RSA 635:1. In each case the superior court denied his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.
At 12:40 a.m. on August 5,1983, Officer Murphy of the New London Police Department received a report of a burglary in progress at Dexter’s Jewelry Store on Main Street in New London. When he reached the store he found that someone was in it, and shortly thereafter he saw someone run from the rear of the building into the woods. The felon ignored an order to stop. Officer Murphy returned to his cruiser, radioed the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. PellicciSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Collins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- In re GrimmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. FaragiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. LaurieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.