Legal Opinion

Auger v. Town of Strafford

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 23, 2007No. 2006-646PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

The plaintiffs, abutters to and neighbors of a conservation development subdivision (CDS) proposed by the intervenor, Graystone Builders, Inc. (Graystone), appeal an order of the Superior Court (Fauver, J.) affirming a decision of the planning board for the defendant, the Town of Strafford, that approved Graystone’s proposed CDS and yield plan. Graystone cross-appeals the trial court’s remand of a wetlands issue to the board. We affirm in part, reverse in part, vacate in part and remand.

The record reveals the following: Graystone proposes to build a CDS on a sixty-five-acre lot in Strafford,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Paul G. Simard v. Board of Education of the Town of GrotonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Kelleher v. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. In re GrimmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. State v. MacElmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. City of Keene v. James Cleaveland & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  3. Lucien Vincent v. Davina MacLeanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  4. In the Matter of Danielle Ross and Christopher RossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  5. Auger v. TOWN OF STRAFFORDSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API