Legal Opinion

State v. Grundler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 11, 1959No. 145PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mooee J.

Defendants were represented at the criminal trial by counsel of their own choice, employed ’and paid by -them. Upon the coming in of the verdict the jury was polled. The defendants, and each of them, in apt time moved to set aside the verdict, for new trial and in arrest of judgment. Upon the overruling of the motions, defendants gave notice of appeal iamd made written'application in due form to be permitted to appeal in forma pauperis. The court forthwith entered an ureter providing: (1) defendants are permitted to 'appeal to Supreme Court without giving bond for costs and' in forma…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Irvine v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Edelman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Robert J. Grundler and Joseph L. Jelly v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
  3. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API