Legal Opinion

Culbreth v. Britt Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1949PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

The only assignment of error presented on this appeal is that the court erred in signing the judgment set out in the record. This assignment of error raises only the questions (1) as to whether the agreed facts, on which the trial judge acted, support the judgment, and (2) whether error in matters of law appears upon the face of the record. Simmons v. Lee, 230 N.C. 216, 53 S.E. 2d 79, and cases cited. See also Van Hanford v. McSwain, 230 N.C. 229, 53 S.E. 2d 84; Employment Security Comm. v. Roberts, 230 N.C. 262, 52 S.E. 2d 890; Credit Corp. v. Roberts, 230 N.C. 654, 55 S.E. 2d 85; Parker v.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hanford v. McSwainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Gibbs v. . HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Simmons v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Cover v. . McAdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Jones v. BalsleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. EL LOWIE & COMPANY v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Convent of the Sisters of Saint Joseph of Chestnut Hill v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API