Legal Opinion

Locklear v. Oxendine

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1951No. 676PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinbokNe, J.

A careful consideration of the exceptions covered by the assignments of error presented on this appeal reveal error prejudicial to defendants.

I. The judge of Superior Court in disposing of defendants’ exception to the failure of the referee to find the facts on the evidence bearing upon their plea that the deed to plaintiff from D. L. Stewart, et al., is void in that the consideration therefor is champertous, likewise failed to find the facts, and to make the conclusions of law arising thereon.

Defendants group exceptions thereto, and pertaining thereto, and assign same as error. ¥e agree, and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Prevatt v. Harrelson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Moore v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Hanford v. McSwainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Smith v. . HartsellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Andrews v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. McDaris v. Breit Bar" T" CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Powell v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API