Legal Opinion

Moore v. Deal

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1954No. 382PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff appellant in his brief admitted that the defendant Deal’s attorney, Bedford W. Black, “was guilty of neglect, and even gross neglect. It is doubted that there has ever been a case before this Court where the neglect of the attorney was as great and as gross as the neglect of the defendant’s attorney in this ease.” That defendant’s attorney Black was guilty of inexcusable neglect of his client Deal’s case is not debatable.

We have had many eases for decision as to when relief will be afforded to a client against whom a judgment by default has been rendered by the negligence of his…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Roberts v. . AllmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Pepper v. Clegg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Manning v. Roanoke & Tar River RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Norton v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Fairchild Realty Co. v. Spiegel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Kirby v. ASHEVILLE CONTRACTING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Fountain v. PatrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API