Schulz v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
260 Wis. 541 (1952)
SCHULZ, Respondent,
vs.
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.[*]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
January 7, 1952.
February 5, 1952.
For the appellant there were briefs by Bender, Trump, McIntyre, Trimborn & Godfrey, attorneys, and Rodger S. Trump of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Rodger S. Trump.
For the respondent there was a brief by Curran & Curran of Mauston, and oral argument by Charles P. Curran and Thomas J. Curran.
BROWN, J.
Sec. 192.29 (5), Stats., directs the warning which must be placed at every railway-highway crossing.
"Danger…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bengston v. EstesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Schulz v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by12 opinions
- Anderson v. Wisconsin Central Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- Kemp v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Kurer v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Hoffmann v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Dombeck v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.