Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1937No. 26404PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In October, 1933, Pyles, while in the course of his employment, received an injury consisting of a compound, comminuted and crushing fracture of the upper third of the right femur, was confined to the hospital with that limb in a plaster cast which, when removed, left his leg stiff and ankylosed, and, was directed by his physician to use a cane to assist in ambulating in order to strengthen the leg and hasten recovery. He applied for and received workmen's compensation for that injury.

In April, 1934, while following his physician's instructions, Pyles placed weight upon the injured member,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hile v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Industrial Commission v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zavatsky v. StringerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State ex rel. Hess v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State ex rel. Welker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API