Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1948No. 31407PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Welker contends that the Industrial Commission grossly abused its discretion and acted in an arbitrary manner in refusing to award him compensation on the basis of permanent and total disability, under the Workmen's Compensation Act and particularly under rule 3 of the commission's rules applicable in inoperable hernia cases.

Rule 3 reads as follows:

"If operation is contra-indicated on account of advanced age, heart disease or some other condition compensation shall be paid according to the medical proof as in other claims."

There is ample medical evidence in the record to support the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hile v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Industrial Commission v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Bulk Terminals Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API