Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hess v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1938No. 26813Published

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Relator asks for a writ of mandamus to compel the Industrial Commission of Ohio to award Mm compensation for the loss of total vision in Ms left eye by reason of the removal of same as a result of an injury suffered by Mm in the course of Ms employment by The American Stove Company.

The relator had made application for compensation to the Industrial Commission of Ohio, which was denied. Thereafter he filed his petition in the Court of Common Pleas, which court made a finding that the relator was entitled to participate in the Workmen’s Compensation Fund. Pursuant to the finding in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API