Legal Opinion
Rosenfield v. Rogin, Nassau, Caplan, Lassman & Hirtle, LLC
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 16, 2002No. AC 20758PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
In this legal malpractice action, the plaintiff, Edward Rosenfield, claims that the defendant law firm, Rogin, Nassau, Caplan, Lassman & Hirtle, LLC (defendant), failed to file in a timely manner a legal malpractice action on his behalf against his former attorney. The trial court rendered a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed, claiming that the court improperly concluded that (1) the collateral estoppel doctrine did not apply and (2) the continuing course of conduct and continuous representation doctrines tolled the statute of limitations in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Fichera v. Mine Hill Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- S.M.S. Textile Mills, Inc. v. Brown, Jacobson, Tillinghast, Lahan & King, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Rosato v. MascardoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Bellemare v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Deleo v. NusbaumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Epstein v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Carnemolla v. WalshConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.