Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Mahaney & Higgins

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1992No. D-0678PublishedCited by 210 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNYN, Justice.

This case decides the proper application of the statute of limitations in a legal malpractice case when the attorney allegedly commits malpractice while providing legal services in the prosecution or defense of a claim which results in litigation. The trial court granted the attorneys’ motion for summary judgment based on their affirmative defense of limitations, and the court of appeals affirmed. 822 S.W.2d 63. We hold that the statute of limitations was tolled until all appeals were exhausted on the underlying suit in which the malpractice allegedly occurred.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Zimmie v. Calfee, Halter & GriswoldOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. Hennekens v. HoerlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by210 opinions

  1. Carvell v. BottomsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re: Karen A. Briscoe Alfred Lara Wanda T. Kizer Debra Alexander Rhonda Allen Mary Green Glenda D. Abbott and Leslie BalesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Murphy v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Farah v. Mafrige & Kormanik, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996

205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API