Legal Opinion
Rosato v. Mascardo
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 13, 2004No. AC 23423PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The principal issue in this medical malpractice case is whether the “continuous treatment” or “continuing course of conduct” doctrine tolls the statute of limitations in General Statutes § 52-584. The plaintiff, Antonina Rosato, brought this action ultimately in two counts against the defendant, Teresita Mascardo, alleging that she suffered damages as a result of the defendant’s unauthorized insertion of silicone breast implants during a surgical procedure. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered after the grant*398ing of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment as…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Collens v. New Canaan Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Giglio v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- McCann Real Equities Series XXII, LLC v. David McDermott Chevrolet, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Vollemans v. Town of WallingfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Macellaio v. Newington Police DepartmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Grey v. Stamford Health System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Vanliner Insurance v. FayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.