Legal Opinion

Ericsson v. Braukman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 22, 1992No. 87-1087C; CA A64929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action for declaratory and injunctive relief to resolve a dispute with defendants, their neighbors, concerning an easement across defendants’ property. The trial court issued a judgment defining the scope of the easement. Plaintiffs appeal.

The property owned by the parties is shown on the map (see Appendix). Parcel A is owned by plaintiffs, and defendants own Parcel B. Both properties were previously in the common ownership of the Davies, who conveyed Parcel A to Danielson in 1968. The contract of sale called for Danielson to have an easement across Parcel B:

“First…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones Et Ux v. Edwards Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Miller v. VaughnOregon Supreme Court · 1880
  3. State Department of Fish & Wildlife v. KortgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Haskell v. BorschowaOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Espedal v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gabriel v. WoodMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. R.C.R., Inc. v. Rainbow Canyon, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Watson v. BanducciCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. D'ABBRACCI v. Shaw-BastianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Clark v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API