Ericsson v. Braukman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action for declaratory and injunctive relief to resolve a dispute with defendants, their neighbors, concerning an easement across defendants’ property. The trial court issued a judgment defining the scope of the easement. Plaintiffs appeal.
The property owned by the parties is shown on the map (see Appendix). Parcel A is owned by plaintiffs, and defendants own Parcel B. Both properties were previously in the common ownership of the Davies, who conveyed Parcel A to Danielson in 1968. The contract of sale called for Danielson to have an easement across Parcel B:
“First…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones Et Ux v. Edwards Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Miller v. VaughnOregon Supreme Court · 1880
- State Department of Fish & Wildlife v. KortgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Haskell v. BorschowaOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Espedal v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gabriel v. WoodMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- R.C.R., Inc. v. Rainbow Canyon, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Watson v. BanducciCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- D'ABBRACCI v. Shaw-BastianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Clark v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.