Legal Opinion

State Department of Fish & Wildlife v. Kortge

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 4, 1987No. CC84-148; CA A37038PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action for a declaratory judgment to establish that it could use a parcel of real property it had purchased “for recreation by the general public so long as that use does not unreasonably interfere with defendants’ rights” and an injunction prohibiting defendants from posting and enforcing “No Trespassing” signs. Defendants, whose predecessors in title originally conveyed the property to plaintiffs predecessor in title, claimed that, under a reservation in the original conveyance, defendants retained the right to exclude the general public. They also alleged as an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woods v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Fendall v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Minto v. Salem Water, Light & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Miller v. VaughnOregon Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Drury Et Ux v. PekarOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lobato v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. Clark v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Ericsson v. BraukmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Tooker v. FeinsteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Central Oregon Fabricators, Inc. v. HudspethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API