Legal Opinion

Clark v. Kuhn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 15, 2000No. 98CV0665; CA A107753PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this declaratory judgment action to have the trial court determine the extent of an easement for ingress and egress for defendant’s benefit that crosses his property. After the trial court ruled, defendant brought this appeal. We review de novo, ORS 19.415(3), and affirm.

Plaintiff and defendant own adjacent property. Access to defendant’s property is provided by an easement across the front of plaintiffs property. The easement was created by deed and is defined as “an easement for right-of-way purposes over a strip of land 25.0 feet in width lying adjacent to and on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones Et Ux v. Edwards Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hyland v. FondaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Ericsson v. BraukmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. McKee v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Miller v. VaughnOregon Supreme Court · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. D'ABBRACCI v. Shaw-BastianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Pfaendler v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Sander v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Craft v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Bedard v. ScherrerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API