Legal Opinion

Espedal v. Stone

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 28, 1987No. 83-1622C; CA A39297PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action for damages for interference with easements and for declaratory and injunctive relief. Defendants appeal from the parts of the judgment declaring their property subject to prescriptive easements, enjoining them from interfering with those easements and awarding plaintiffs $2,000 for defendants’ interference with the easements.

Defendants argue that the evidence necessary to establish an easement by prescription must be clear and convincing and that plaintiffs’ evidence was not. If plaintiffs’ burden was to establish the easements by clear and convincing evidence,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ericsson v. BraukmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Wagner v. O'CallaghanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API