Legal Opinion
Hanna v. Lane
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 4, 1985No. 84 C 1635PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Edward Hanna, plaintiff in this pro se civil rights suit, initiated this action with a complaint against twenty-two individuals employed by the Illinois Department of Corrections and the Joliet Correctional Center. Because the broad allegations of the original complaint did not link the named defendants to the facts underlying Hanna’s claims, defendants moved to dismiss. Plaintiff responded with a memorandum thoroughly detailing all the facts relevant to his claim. The Court treated the memorandum as an amended complaint incorporating the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Michael Hanrahan v. Michael P. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Thomas Crowder v. Russell E. LashCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jackie Vance v. Howard Peters, Iii, Director, Jane E. Higgins, Warden, and James Roy, Correctional OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Paul Knox v. Kenneth L. McGinnis and Thomas RothCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Newman v. Checkrite California, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1995
- Balabanos v. North American Investment Group, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Champlaie v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.