Legal Opinion

Paul Knox v. Kenneth L. McGinnis and Thomas Roth

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 20, 1993No. 91-3527PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

In this prisoner civil rights action, Paul Knox alleges that officials at Stateville Correctional Center (“Stateville”) subjected him to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the eighth amendment when they restrained him with a mechanism comprised of a waist chain, handcuffs, and a “black box.” Prison officials used this restraint on Knox and on all other segregation prisoners when they were transported outside the segregation unit. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants Ken*1407neth L. McGinnis and Thomas Roth1 on a number of…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Williams v. LaraTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lavertis Stewart v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Stewart v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Byron Alston v. H. Christian DebruynCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Wesley Flynn v. David G. SandahlCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API