Legal Opinion
Michael Hanrahan v. Michael P. Lane
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 30, 1984No. 82-2892PublishedCited by 361 opinions
1Per curiam
Pro se plaintiff, Michael Hanrahan, appeals the dismissal of his § 1983 action challenging prison disciplinary actions taken against him. The plaintiff is suing three prison guards, the members of the Adjustment Committee who sanctioned him, the Warden and the Commissioner of Corrections. These disciplinary actions, plaintiff alleges, were taken against him in retaliation for his refusal to succumb to the extortion demands of the defendant prison guards.
The district court dismissed petitioner’s claims. 1 For the reasons which follow, we reverse the dismissal and remand the case for a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by361 opinions
- Gary Wayne Freeman v. Richard RideoutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Monte McPherson v. Daniel R. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Muriel D. Black v. Michael P. Lane, Michael Neal, P.A. Severs, CaptainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Todd A. Lagerstrom v. Phil KingstonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- James L. Cain v. Michael P. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
356 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.