Legal Opinion

Newman v. Checkrite California, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 19, 1995No. Civ. S-93-1557 LKKPublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KARLTON, Chief Judge Emeritus.

Plaintiffs brought suit under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., and California Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seq. 1 The parties cross moved for summary judgment. The motions were taken under submission after oral argument and are disposed of herein.

I

FACTS 2

Plaintiffs Newman, Benefield and Reeves are individuals who wrote bad checks for retail purchases ranging in amount from four to forty six dollar’s. The checks were turned over to defendant CheckRite, a debt collection agency. 3 Defendant CheckRite and its…

2Cases cited106 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Burch v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
  2. Terri L. Bass v. Stolper, Koritzinsky, Brewster & Neider, S.C. And Kathy LeschenskyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Gertsch v. Johnson & Johnson, Finance Corp. (In Re Gertsch)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Kistner v. Law Offices of Michael P. Margelefsky, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API