Legal Opinion

In Re JULIO L

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 2000No. CV-99-0377-PRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*2AMENDED OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review to determine the grounds on which a student may be prosecuted for “disorderly conduct” on an allegation of engaging in “seriously disruptive behavior” in violation of A.R.S. § 13-2904(A)(1). We conclude the evidence was insufficient to prove that the juvenile’s improper and offensive behavior violated the criminal law. We thus reverse the decision of the trial court and vacate the decision of the court of appeals.

¶ 2 We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. VI, § 5(3).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 3 The juvenile, Julio L., age…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. FulminanteArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In Re Louise C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Hughes v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. In the Interest of D. A. D.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. NICK R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re John M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. In Re Andrew C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Prosise v. Hon kottke/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API