Coulter v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ACKERMAN, Judge.
¶ 1 Petitioner (“Claimant”) seeks Rule 10 special action review of an Industrial Commission of Arizona (“Commission”) Award and Decision Upon Review dismissing her Petition to Reopen. Claimant timely filed letters from her treating physician that supported reopening, but her treating physician died prior to the hearing. Because the authoring doctor’s death prevented cross-examination, the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) ruled that the letters could not be admitted as a matter of law and dismissed the Petition for lack of supporting medical *386evidence. We conclude that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. EdwardsArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. Michael C. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75482Arizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Jones v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- PFS v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gonzalez v. interstate/xl SpecialtyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Gray v. Courtyard Towers dba/church MutualCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024